The information on this website is taken from records made available by state and local law enforcement departments, courts, city and town halls, and other public and private sources. You may be shocked by the information found in your search reports. Please search responsibly.
Recordsfinder.com is not a “consumer reporting agency” and does not supply “consumer reports” as those terms are defined by the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Pursuant to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, you acknowledge and agree not to use any information gathered through Recordsfinder.com for any purpose under the FCRA, including but not limited to evaluating eligibility for personal credit, insurance, employment, or tenancy.
Searches of license plate and VIN information are available only for purposes authorized by the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act of 1994 (DPPA).
By clicking “I Agree” you consent to our Terms of Service, agree not to use the information provided by Recordsfinder.com for any unlawful purposes, and you understand that we cannot confirm that information provided below is accurate or complete.
The search you are about to conduct on this website is a people search to find initial results of the search subject. You understand that any search reports offered from this website will only be generated with the purchase of the report or account registration.
Child pornography has ballooned with the advent of the Internet as the ability to quickly share images and video over long distances has become as easy as a press of a button.
Penalties for possession of child porn aren't as severe as those for producing such photos and videos, as the latter generally involves actual exploitation or sexual assault of children but both are likely felonies. First time offenders charged with producing child porn may be prosecuted under state or federal laws or both, with a 15 to 20 year minimum sentence likely.
Much more severe punishment is reserved for those who sexually abuse children and distribute photos or videos of the acts. Most states have special laws pertaining to
Those severe penalties for sexual exploitation of a child were invoked recently when six South Carolina men were rounded up by police for distributing child pornography online. Each of the men faced one or more count of exploitation for sharing the images, and each count carries a maximum 10 year prison sentence.
There is no mandatory minimum sentence for possessing child pornography, which allows the courts wide latitude for penalizing someone caught with images, but if the person in possession has a previous sex offense conviction the sentencing guidelines call for 10-20 years in prison. Those convicted of intent to distribute child pornography are likely to receive at least 5 years in prison; those with a previous sex offense on their record get a mandatory minimum of 15 years in prison. In addition, any use of mail or the Internet to distribute images elevates the possession or distribution to a federal felony.
Those convicted of felony crimes lose their right to vote in most states, may not possess firearms, may not join the U.S. military, and do not qualify for federal funding for a variety of benefits like housing. In addition, those charged with sex crimes are likely to be required to register as sex offenders so that neighbors and local officials are aware of their presence when they are released from prison.
Among recent child pornography scandals was Jared Fogel, the spokesman for sandwich company Subway. Fogel worked closely with the administrator of a foundation who was arrested on child porn charges. Fogel himself was soon thereafter charged with crossing state lines to have sex with underage children as well as possession of pornography. He was ordered to pay $100,000 restitution to each of his victims in addition to a prison term.
Eight students in a suburban Pennsylvania high school were charged with possessing and distributing child pornography after a spate of "sexting" during which some sent one another nude photos and a brief sex video. The charges prompted Pennsylvania to rethink what constitutes felony pornography because the students consented and possessed mostly photos of themselves. In another case around the same time a young woman said she felt violated when the principal of her high school confiscated her cell phone because she was using it during school hours – but then looked at the photos saved on the phone and found nude photos of the student, which he turned in to police.